It has happend so many times that I lost count. I know that there are also many who disagree with this statement. Why, you might think. Wel, because Microsoft is still maintaining GP, adding new features and keeping it compatible with modern versions of Windows. But the software is not overhauled like NAV. Including to be able to use the windows client.
Many would love that,. The fact that Business Central is based on NAV makes it easy for me to join the new community but it has cost us a great level of productivity,. I cannot wait to go to Vienna and see the roadmap. Personally I think we can all use some slowing down after all the changes in the last few years.
Setting Unrealistic Live Dates
The future of Business Central is international. BC is the only flexible SMB solution with localizations and translations all over the globe. The reactions vary from being marketing correct to more realistic. But that does not mean it has to be with breaking changes and most of all, it did not have to happen in Visual Studio Code with Extensions.
Microsoft is years, maybe a decade too late with starting this project.
You need discipline and consistency. Especially the latter seems to be where Microsoft is totally off these days moving away from patterns in a horrible way. The compile should have been enhanced checking if modules would compile on their own. With these simple changes modularity would have been possible a long time ago and the ecosystem would have been used to it. This means tenants cannot be upgraded until partners are ready with the refactoring, which is a lot of work.
To upgrade the code a partner has to compile against Docker or the installed DVD, but how does the customer test against their own data? A simple example is the function to read the contents of a zipfile that changed from a temptable to a list of text. This allows to create a new and improved version while keeping the old one and mark it to be obsolete in the future. The same can be done with new codeunits. Just leave the old ones there. Point them to the new code if you want to. This way of moving API releated code has been normal in all frameworks for decades.
Why can a huge company like Microsoft no do this with Business Central? I just cannot get my head around it. That does not mean you cannot have your own opinion and it does not mean you always have to agree with what Microsoft does. I am in favor of continuing to break the functional app into pieces with contracts. Updated existing topics and added new topics about how to specify control and menu IDs in the transformation input. Transforming Control and Menu IDs. How to: Create the PageTranslations. Compiling Objects. How to: Create a Page.
How to: Run a Page.
Added new topics about troubleshooting pages that you transform with the form transformation tool. Transforming Forms to Pages. Installation Walkthroughs. How to: Set an Image on an Action. Creating Activity Buttons for the Navigation Pane. Security in the RoleTailored Environment. Updated content about how to develop for Microsoft Dynamics NAV , including explanations about the differences in developing for the Classic client and the RoleTailored client. File Handling.
What's New: Developer and IT Pro Changes for Microsoft Dynamics NAV R2
Creating and Maintaining Pages. Home Button Overview Report Property Reference Added topics about enabling hyperlinks, external images, and external assemblies. What's new See Automation Added new topics and updated existing topics about using Automation with the RoleTailored client.
Schedule Overview Form Multilanguage Functionality Updated the topics about developing multilanguage-enabled applications and installing language modules. Web Services Programming Tips Best Practices Analyzer for Microsoft Dynamics NAV Added references in two topics for this new diagnostic tool , which identifies configuration issues that might be preventing your three-tier deployment of Microsoft Dynamics NAV from working correctly and is available separately as a download.
Creating activity buttons for the navigation pane. Change View. Database Changes that Require Elevated Permissions Updated the information on permissions necessary for various administrator tasks. Cues Added a walkthrough that explains how to create and implement a Cue on the Role Center. Home Button Added a new topic that describes the Home button and how to add items to it.
Report Property Reference Added topics about enabling hyperlinks, external images, and external assemblies. Automation Added new topics and updated existing topics about using Automation with the RoleTailored client. Improved Automation walkthroughs. Multilanguage Functionality Updated the topics about developing multilanguage-enabled applications and installing language modules. Code Rules in Form Transformation Updated existing topic to fix examples and improve clarity. Code Rules. Of course for the Microsoft NAV partner that the customer is leaving in question, they do not like that.
They want to keep the customer on and collect money without doing the work. It also leads to hurt feelings from the partner in question. I would equate that feeling as being dumped by your significant other. One of the oldest trick is through licensing. What can you do? Threaten a lawsuit? Or did you read the print when you bought NAV from that company? If you did, did you understand what you were signing? I fully understand why Microsoft does not want to get involved in these situations.
This topic should probably warrant a separate blog article since the question of Extensions comes into play. Basically any extensions can be treated like the objects in the 30 million ranges. The other way is to lock down the database. Coincidentally, I was at a Dynamics Business Central conference Directions where all of the best NAV experts are in one place for me to pick brains from.
More specifically, in the triggers. Sure enough, checking the Triggers on the Object table in the SQL table, sure enough, we found this:. After removing the table trigger from the Object table, we were freely able to modify the database objects again. This, to me, left a really bad taste in my mouth. Partners will go as far as locking down the database to prevent other developers on working with them.
- Nanotechnology for Bioenergy and Biofuel Production.
- English Medieval Knight 1300-1400 (Warrior).
- Post navigation;
- Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2018.
- Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective!
- Neuroscience: Science of the Brain - An Introduction for Young Students.
- Face to Face;
I just want to put this out there so people will not have to suffer through this as well. Once is enough. I realize there are some tools that I do not mention that are in the inventory module. Everyone is super busy these days, the last thing people want to do is administrative work. I believe we should take the simplest route in setup and configuration to get the company up and running. But what happens when the customer is live and actually using the system in their day to day operation?
In addition to their daily workload, now they have to click some buttons in order to properly close? The new ERP system is supposed to save us steps, not increase them. We, as consultants and developers, often forgets this important goal. Remembering details to close out the period in the system should be, in my opinion, be kept at a minimum none if possible.
The purpose of the inventory period is to enforce the rule that no item transaction can be posted before the date on the inventory period that is closed. Both will prevent people from posting into prior periods. All of the restrictions that the Inventory Periods tries to manage is something the accounting manager is already doing in their standard operating procedure. I do believe Inventory Periods have their uses in certain situations.
More often than not, I walk into companies with elaborate setups, with Inventory Periods being one of them, that has not been used since the first 1 or 2 periods since the company went live. Adding additional step of inventory periods will not help the situation. Microsoft likes to add functions to keep track of functions.
In my opinion, this makes the system and its maintenance more complicated, which nobody wants. Fortunately, this function is not mandatory. If not, please check out my other articles on the subject on how to properly care for the inventory module in Dynamics Business Central formerly Dynamics NAV. While asking companies to run the adjust cost process, some people will report that they experience unwanted entries made to the previous accounting periods. The reason is because the adjust cost process will always adjust to the date of the original sales transaction unless specified otherwise.
Setting Unrealistic Live Dates Overview Typically in an implementation, there will be a lot of moving parts. Setting Unrealistic Live Dates For some managers, the idea seem to be to set a high expectation for the project. What always ends up happening is one of the following: The company goes live without being ready The live date gets postponed Of the 2 scenarios that can happen, if 1 happens, the implementation will always lead to failure.
Culture of Expecting Failure Usually, when a company misses their first go live date, they will miss their subsequent go-live dates as well. Prevention Set realistic live dates and stick to it. Overview Just a friendly reminder or reminder for myself that in order to get the Idle Client Time to work properly. Overview Not all customers uses Office as their e-mail.
Resolution The problem is with how Google detects which application it deems as less secure. On the Less Secure App access, you will need to turn this on. Fed Up So one of our clients, fed up with the amount of work they have to put into creating catalogs every year, decided to make a change. The Challenge As we looked for an add-on, but was most were too expensive and not scalable or customizable. Har Har… So having add-on or a separate piece of software for catalog was out of the question.
Figure It Out First we needed to create an infrasture to house their item categories and the text descriptions of the catalog. The next challenge was to actually print the thing out. Not to mention the margins and the page breaks… The Solution Our prayers seems to be answered with a simple tool from a company in Europe. This is what they created for their catalog using NAV: Not just printing catalog, this allows the customer to utilize the same report to print their weekly and monthly promotional catalogs at a fraction of the time.
What Version of Microsoft Dynamics NAV Should I Use for This Database?
Conclusion The whole concept of ERP is to save you time and make processes more efficient. Changing Protection Level When you set the Protection Level as the default EncryptAndSign , every data packet being sent and received are encrypted and authenticated to ensure you are who you are. Proceed at your own risk!! Overview Addressing inefficiencies in any company is a crap shoot. The Cost The technology portion is always where misunderstanding occurs. The Real Cost The real cost of addressing the mess is the management of the company.
Conclusion In the end, technology will only faciliate your existing process.
Related What’s New for Microsoft Dynamics® NAV 2009 Installation and Development
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved