Chapter 5 focuses on concepts. While properties are based on one quality domain, perceptual concepts are proposed to be based on several domains.
- From Actions to Effects: Three Constraints on Event Mappings.
- Nosintro TCP/IP Over Packet Radio: An Introduction to the KA9Q Network Operating System;
- Military Conscription: An Economic Analysis of the Labour Component in the Armed Forces!
- How the Brain’s “Inner GPS” Creates Conceptual Spaces in the Mind;
Therefore, they are multimodal instead of amodal; e. The location of a concept in the conceptual space may vary, depending on the context of a linguistic utterance. In Chapter 6, classical problems in the explanation of inductive reasoning, following N. Chapter 7 discusses computational issues involved at the symbolic, conceptual and subconceptual levels of analysis.
Conceptual Spaces: On the geometry of thought | HKUST CSE
Unfortunately, the discussion is not deep see my comment below. The mechanism by which structural constraints generate correlations between the changes in connection weights was not identified. How Homo Became Sapiens is in fact a book on the philosophy of cognitive ethology, since it provides a systematic and convincing analysis of several findings in the study of animal cognition and behavior.
The book is not based on an analysis of evolutionary history, as the title seems to suggest. The main argument of the book is built upon the identification of what mental functions are a precondition for others; for instance, representing conceived as a kind of internal simulation of the world; p. One important achievement in the book is recognizing the importance of associative and crossmodal processing in the mammalian brain. This approach contrasts with the concept of amodal representations usually assumed in the context of the symbolic approach.
Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought
In this perspective, representations are not manipulated in a separate, amodal space, but exist in the associative and crossmodal domain. Pereira Jr linguistic development lines meet they tend to go on together. Besides having a strong foundation in Philosophy, these books may also be considered as transdisciplinary efforts to make a valuable synthesis at the foundations of cognitive science. In my reading, I found them clarifying and constructive, although there is a gap between the proposed framework and its implementation. However, his reasoning, always well- crafted, oscillates between symbolic and subsymbolic models of mental computa- tion, not contributing with a new explanatory mechanism.
Browse more videos
This "Cited by" count includes citations to the following articles in Scholar. Add co-authors Co-authors.
- Conceptual Spaces : The Geometry of Thought - ScholarVox International.
- The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States.
- Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought; Peter Gärdenfors; MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
Upload PDF. Follow this author. New articles by this author.
New citations to this author. New articles related to this author's research.
Email address for updates. My profile My library Metrics Alerts. Sign in. Imagine yourself listening to someone who is talking in a language very different from any one you know. Most probably, for you it will be just a series of meaningless noises. If, instead, you are listening to someone speaking in your own native language, usually the meaning of his or her utterances would be as clear to you that you will probably not even notice the peculiarities of his or her phonetics, save if these happen to be very striking or you are interested in them for some reason.
It seems as if, when we listen or read in a language we are familiar with, sounds and graphs magically transform themselves in meanings, or as if it were the meanings themselves of the other people what we were reading or listening to, more than their voices or their writings.
New Evidence for the Strange Geometry of Thought
As the authors express it:. Just as bargainers shake hands after reaching agreement on the terms of a contract, so speakers reach a point at which both believe they have understood what they are talking about. Of course, they may actually mean different things, just as the bargainers might interpret the terms of the contract differently. It is enough that, in a given moment and context, speakers reach a point at which they believe there is mutual understanding. Combining insights from research on joint attention e.
If the function does not reach a fixpoint i.
Related Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved